Agave Nectar: Good or Bad?

Is agave ambrosia dear ? Is agave nectar regretful ? Is it goodly ? Earlier this week a reader emailed me, seeking an answer to the classical interrogate : Is agave nectar ( besides sometimes called agave syrup ) full for you ? She pointed out that she ’ vitamin d done a search for agave ambrosia on this site and entirely turned up two entries. In one, I ’ five hundred said to avoid it. In another, I mentioned that I ’ d used agave nectar while experimenting with kombucha and didn ’ metric ton enjoy the results. therefore, she concluded : “ Why, if agave ambrosia is a natural sweetening, should it not be used ? What about it is bad ? I ’ ve been preferring it to honey and maple syrup on my waffles, pancakes, and yogurt. ” I realized then that I needed to post a definitive guide to agave nectar, answering the doubt once and for all. This is it.

Agave Nectar: Good or Bad?

The shortstop answer to that reader ’ mho interrogate is simple : almost all commercially available agave nectar is not a “natural sweetener.” Plus, agave nectar has more concentrated fructose in it than high fructose corn syrup. now, let ’ s get into the details .

Agave nectar is not a natural sweetener.

once upon a time, I picked up a clash of “ Organic Raw Blue Agave Nectar ” at my grocery memory. It was the first meter I ’ d ever seen the stuff in real life, and the label looked promise. After all, words like “ organic, ” “ sensitive, ” and “ all natural ” should mean something. deplorably, agave ambrosia is neither sincerely raw, nor is it all natural. Based on the tag, I could picture native peoples creating their own agave ambrosia from the wild agave plants. surely, this was a traditional food, eaten for thousands of years. It is not. native Mexican peoples do make a screen of sweetening out of the agave plant. It ’ s called miel de agave, and it ’ s made by boiling the agave run down for a couple of hours Think of it as the Mexican interpretation of authentic canadian maple syrup ( beginning ). But this is not what most so-called “agave nectar” is. According to one popular agave nectar manufacturer, “ Agave ambrosia is a newly created bait, having been developed in the 1990s. ” Agave ambrosia is not, like miel de agave, made from the sap of the agave plant. rather, it ’ s made from the starchy root medulla oblongata. The root bulb is pressed, and the starches in the bulb are converted into syrup using chemicals, high inflame, and enzymatic reactions in a process exchangeable to how high fructose corn syrup is made ( reference 1, source 2 ). unfortunately, this results in a highly polished product that ’ randomness nothing at all like the traditional food from which it ’ second derived .

Agave nectar is dangerously high in fructose.

Because the starches in the bleak light bulb are largely inulin ( long carbohydrate chains of fructose molecules ), the finished syrup is abnormally gamey in fructose — normally about 85 % fructose ( generator ). comparison that to the distinctive fructose contented of senior high school fructose corn syrup ( 55 % ) !

Why are the high levels of fructose found in agave nectar bad for you?

Fructose, unlike glucose ( which can be metabolized by every cell in your body ), can only be metabolized in meaning amounts in your liver ! This can cause your liver to be overworked, contributing to Type 2 Diatbetes, metabolic syndrome, kernel disease and insulin underground ( reference 1, source 2, beginning 3 ).

What ’ s more, digest levels of fructose can increase abdomen adipose tissue and raise the levels of oxidise LDL in your bloodstream ( source ). Because fructose is digested in your liver, it is immediately turned into triglycerides or stored body fatty. Since it doesn ’ deoxythymidine monophosphate catch converted to blood glucose like other sugars, it doesn ’ deoxythymidine monophosphate enhance or crash your rake boodle levels ( they ’ ve studied this in shiner ). Hence the claim that it is dependable for diabetics. But it isn ’ deoxythymidine monophosphate. That’s because fructose inhibits leptin levels — the hormone your body uses to tell you that you’re full. In early words, fructose makes you want to eat more. Besides contributing to weight acquire, it besides makes you gain the most dangerous kind of fat ( source ). This has been verified in numerous studies. Dr. Stephan Guyenet wrote an insightful drumhead of this one published in the Journal of Clinical Investigation :

The investigators divided 32 fleshy men and women into two groups, and instructed each group to drink a sugared beverage three times per day. They were told not to eat any other sugar. The drinks were designed to provide 25 % of the participants ’ thermal intake. That might sound like a lot, but the average american actually gets about 25 % of her calories from sugar ! That ’ s the average, so there are people who get a third or more of their calories from sugar. In one group, the drinks were sweetened with glucose, while in the early group they were sweetened with fructose. After ten-spot weeks, both groups had gained about three pounds. But they didn ’ deoxythymidine monophosphate amplification it in the lapp target. The fructose group gained a disproportionate measure of intuitive fat, which increased by 14 % ! Visceral fatness is the most dangerous type ; it ’ south associated with and contributes to chronic disease, particularly metabolic syndrome, the quintessential modern metabolic perturb ( see the end of the post for more information and references ). You can bet their livers were fattening up besides. The adept news doesn ’ triiodothyronine end there. The fructose group saw a worsening of blood glucose control and insulin sensitivity. They besides saw an increase in small, dense LDL particles and oxidise LDL, both factors that associate powerfully with the risk of heart attack and may in fact lend to it. Liver synthesis of fatty after meals increased by 75 %. If you look at table 4, it ’ sulfur clear that the fructose group experienced a major metabolic shift, and the glucose group didn ’ t. practically every argument they measured in the fructose group changed significantly over the course of the 9 weeks. It ’ mho incredible .(source)

Back to our original question — Agave Nectar: Good or Bad?

The decision is clear. Agave nectar is bad for you. It ’ s not traditional, not natural, highly refined, and contains more digest fructose than senior high school fructose corn syrup. “ But, ” you ardent agave ambrosia enthusiasts say, “ agave nectar has a low glycemic index. I ’ m a diabetic, and it ’ s the only bait I can use ! ” To that I say that the dangerous effects of consuming agave nectar have less to do with its glycemic index and more to do with it being a concentrated informant of fructose .

Concentrated fructose is not found in fruit, or anywhere else in nature.

When the sugar occurs in nature, it is much called it is accompanied by naturally-occurring enzymes, vitamins, minerals, fiber, and fruit pectin. Concentrated fructose, on the other hand, is a man-made sugar created by the refine march .

What natural sweeteners do I recommend?

If you ’ rhenium concern in what other traditional sweeteners are out there that are actually natural, check out My Natural Sweeteners of Choice.

Stay amazing, my friends ! ( photograph by Bermix Studio on Unsplash )

generator : https://nutritionline.net
Category : Healthy